Cummings v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

221 A.2d 908, 243 Md. 702, 1966 Md. LEXIS 585
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided July 27, 1966·No. App. No. 133·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of Judge Byrnes in the court below. While Judge Byrnes reasonably concluded that petitioner did in fact knowingly waive the right to be represented at his trial by court-appointed counsel, it appears that petitioner also contends that it is constitutionally impossible to waive this right. This point was settled in Ware v. State, 235 Md. 131, which held that Gideon v. Wainwright, [703] 372 U. S. 335, 9 L. Ed. 2d 799, did not change the long-standing rule that an accused has a right to' proceed without counsel following a knowing and intelligent waiver. The principle remains unaffected by the more recent Supreme Court cases dealing with right to> counsel and self-incrimination.

Application denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 221 A.2d 908, 243 Md. 702, 1966 Md. LEXIS 585 (Md. 1966).

221 A.2d 908 (Cummings v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CUMMINGS, ETC. v. Warden
221 A.2d 908 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1966)