Cummings v. Topco Associates, LLC
Opinion
fbesueG SiaN □ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT a ereeeerey SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK APE RCT CR ONTO AT pay ee GLYNNIS WYNN and KATELYNN a □□ others similarly situated, es 823/902 | Plaintiffs, -against- 19 CIVIL 11104 (RA) JUDGMENT TOPCO ASSOCIATES, LLC, Defendant. nnn eee eee X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated February 22, 2021, the Court granted Defendant's motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint on January 19, 2021. See Dkt. 44; Wynn v. Topco Assocs., LLC, 2021 WL 168541 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 19, 2021). The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a second amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in the opinion and order. Any amended complaint was to be filed no later than February 19, 2021, and the Court stated that "[flailure to file an amended complaint by that date will result in dismissal of this case with prejudice." That date having passed without the filing of an amended complaint, this action is hereby dismissed with prejudice; accordingly, this case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 23, 202]
RUBY J. KRAJICK ClerkofCourt BY: KA Deputy Clerk j
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. Topco Associates, LLC (Cummings v. Topco Associates, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.