Cummings v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cummings v. State

268 S.W. 1117, 99 Tex. Crim. 126, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cummings v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 104 Tex. Crim. 117 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 28, 1925·No. No. 9199.·Published

Opinion

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Camp County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered his plea of guilty. Evidence was introduced shedding light upon the offense committed. The charge of the court is correct in presenting the law of the case upon a plea of guilty. The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception.

An affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the district court of Camp County of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and his punishment fixed at one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered his plea of guilty. Evidence was introduced shedding light upon the offense committed. The charge of the court is correct in presenting the law of the case upon a plea of guilty. The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception.

An affirmance will be ordered.

Affirmed.

Cummings v. State, 268 S.W. 1117, 99 Tex. Crim. 126, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

268 S.W. 1117 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.