Cummings v. State
35 S.E. 117, 110 Ga. 293, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 361
Opinion
Though the State’s evidence very strongly and conclusively tended to establish the fact that tracks seen near the place of the crime, and which must have been made on the night it was committed, corresponded in minute particulars with shoes belonging to the accused, this, without more, was not sufficient to show; to the exclusion of every other reasonable hypothesis, that he committed the crime. Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. State, 35 S.E. 117, 110 Ga. 293, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 361 (Ga. 1900).
35 S.E. 117 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mark Daniel Wise, Sr. v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
Wise v. State
752 S.E.2d 628 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Moore v. State
92 S.E.2d 313 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1956)
Mincey v. State
60 S.E.2d 389 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1950)
Parks v. State
42 S.E.2d 103 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1947)
Pitts v. State
28 S.E.2d 864 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Pyant v. State
167 S.E. 922 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1933)
Adkins v. State
119 S.E. 612 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
State v. Jacobson
153 N.W. 845 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1915)
Wade v. State
84 S.E. 593 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)
Lindsey v. State
70 S.E. 1114 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1911)
Banks v. State
68 S.E. 334 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)
Williams v. State
51 S.E. 344 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Patton v. State
43 S.E. 533 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1903)