Cummings v. State

236 So. 3d 507
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2018
DocketNo. 1D16–4167
StatusPublished

This text of 236 So. 3d 507 (Cummings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummings v. State, 236 So. 3d 507 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant pleaded no contest to several drug charges and resisting an officer. He had been a passenger in a car stopped by police, and he gave a false name, disobeyed instructions to stay in the car, and ran off. Officers apprehended him and found drugs.

In pleading no contest, Appellant reserved his right to appeal the trial court's order denying his motion to suppress. His sole argument on appeal is that officers had no basis to detain him when they stopped the vehicle in which he was riding. But as he acknowledges in his reply brief, the recent Florida Supreme Court decision in Presley v. State forecloses this argument. 227 So.3d 95 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , No. 17-7139, 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1007, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (Feb. 20, 2018).

AFFIRMED .

Jay, Winsor, and M.K. Thomas, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gregory Presley v. State of Florida
227 So. 3d 95 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2017)
Thomas v. Perry
138 S. Ct. 1007 (Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
236 So. 3d 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.