Cummings v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cummings v. State

166 So. 2d 775

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 12, 1964

DocketNo. 4911

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 166 So. 2d 775 (Cummings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummings v. State, 166 So. 2d 775 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule. No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, denial of which is here appealed, sought to vacate sentences entered in Orange County which would “run consecutive to” sentences imposed in Volusia County. Accordingly, it is apparent on the face of the motion that relief under Rule No. 1 is not presently available, the motion was properly denied and the denial is affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s motion for relief under Criminal Procedure Rule. No. 1, F.S.A. ch. 924 Appendix, denial of which is here appealed, sought to vacate sentences entered in Orange County which would “run consecutive to” sentences imposed in Volusia County. Accordingly, it is apparent on the face of the motion that relief under Rule No. 1 is not presently available, the motion was properly denied and the denial is affirmed.

ALLEN, Acting C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

166 So. 2d 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-state-fladistctapp-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack