Cummings v. State

163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 416, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1589
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 14, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 163 So. 924 (Cummings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummings v. State, 163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 416, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1589 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

-The writ of error here brings for review judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

*417 A careful reading of the Bill of Exceptions contained in .the transcript of record discloses ample substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Therefore, the judgment should he affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 416, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-state-fla-1935.