Cummings v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Cummings v. State

163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 416, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1589

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 14, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

-The writ of error here brings for review judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

*417 A careful reading of the Bill of Exceptions contained in .the transcript of record discloses ample substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Therefore, the judgment should he affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

-The writ of error here brings for review judgment of conviction of manslaughter under an information charging murder in the second degree.

The only question presented is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment.

*417 A careful reading of the Bill of Exceptions contained in .the transcript of record discloses ample substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and judgment.

Therefore, the judgment should he affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, C. J., and Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Cummings v. State, 163 So. 924, 121 Fla. 416, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1589 (Fla. 1935).

Pincite

163 So. 924 (Cummings v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.