Cummings v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Cummings v. State

135 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 626

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 30, 1931

Docket8 Div. 320.

StatusPublished

This text of 135 So. 920 (Cummings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummings v. State, 135 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 626 (Ala. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case was in conflict. That for the state tending to prove that the defendant and his wife were in the possession of three gallons of whisky, and that for the defendant tending to prove that the whisky was owned by and was in possession of a brother-in-law, who was temporarily staying with defendant and his wife. The trial judge had all the parties before him, and, giving to his finding the presumptions to which they are entitled under the law, his judgment is affirmed.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The evidence in this case was in conflict. That for the state tending to prove that the defendant and his wife were in the possession of three gallons of whisky, and that for the defendant tending to prove that the whisky was owned by and was in possession of a brother-in-law, who was temporarily staying with defendant and his wife. The trial judge had all the parties before him, and, giving to his finding the presumptions to which they are entitled under the law, his judgment is affirmed.

Let the judgment be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 So. 920, 24 Ala. App. 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-state-alactapp-1931.