Cummings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided March 25, 2021·No. 18-195·Unpublished

Opinion

Sn the Cunited States Court of Federal Clans

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Filed: March 3, 2021

KATHRYN CUMMINGS, * * No. 18-195V Petitioner, * v. * Special Master Gowen * SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Damages; Stipulation; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Tetanus-Diphtheria-acellular * Pertussis (Tdap); Shoulder Injury Respondent. * Related to Vaccine Administration * * * * * * * * * * * * *

(SIRVA).

Leah V. Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, for petitioner. Julia M. Collison, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON STIPULATION!

On February 7, 2018, Kathryn Cummings (“petitioner”), filed a petition for compensation in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.” Petitioner alleged that as a result of a tetanus-diphtheria-acellular pertussis (“Tdap”) vaccination on May 18, 2017, she suffered a right shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) with onset of pain within forty-eight (48) hours, constituting an injury listed on the Vaccine Injury Table. Petition (ECF No. 1).

On October 6, 2020, I issued formal Findings of Fact that petitioner received the Tdap vaccination in her right arm and that the onset of petitioner’s right shoulder pain was within 48 hours thereafter. Findings of Fact (ECF No. 64). On October 19, 2020, respondent filed his amended Rule 4(c) report in which he stated that petitioner had otherwise satisfied the criteria set forth in the Vaccine Injury Table and the Qualifications and Aids to Interpretation (“QAI”) for

' Pursuant to the E-Government Act of 2002, see 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012), because this opinion contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post it on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims. The Court’s website is at http:/Avww.uscfc.uscourts.gov/aggregator/sources/7. Before the opinion is posted on the Court’s website, each party has 14 days to file a motion requesting redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b). An objecting party must provide the Court with a proposed redacted version of the opinion. /d. If neither party files a motion for redaction within 14 days, the opinion will be posted on the Court’s website without any changes. Id.

> The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program is set forth in Part 2 of the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755, codified as amended 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to 34 (2012) (hereinafter “Vaccine Act” or “the Act”). Hereinafter, individual section references will be to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa of the Act. SIRVA. Resp. Report (ECF No. 65) at 2. That same day, I issued a Ruling on Entitlement (ECF No. 66).

On March 2, 2021, respondent filed a stipulation providing that a decision should be entered awarding compensation to petitioner. Stipulation (ECF No. 75). While maintaining their respective positions, the parties now agree that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 6 of the stipulation, which is attached hereto as Appendix A. Id. at {§[ 5-6.

The stipulation awards a lump sum of $85,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

I adopt the stipulation as the decision of the Court and hereby award compensation in the amount and on the terms set forth therein. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT in accordance with the terms of the parties’ stipulation.?

IT ISSO ORDERED. s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master

3 Entry of judgment is expedited by each party’s filing notice renouncing the right to seek review. Vaccine Rule 11(a). IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) KATHRYN CUMMINGS, ) No. 18-195V ) Special Master Gowen Petitioner, ) ECF ) v. ) ) SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ) HUMAN SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. ) ) STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Kathryn Cummings, petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the “Vaccine Program”). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of a tetanus/diphtheria/acellular pertussis (““Tdap”) vaccine, which vaccine is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the “Table’”’), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. Petitioner received the Tdap vaccine on May 18, 2017.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. On October 19, 2020, the Special Master issued a Ruling on Entitlement, incorporating his October 6, 2020 findings of fact, concluding that petitioner is entitled to compensation for a right-sided shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”). Respondent continues to maintain his contrary position, but will not seek review of the Special Master’s determination of entitlement upon its memorialization as a reviewable decision.

5. The parties now agree that a decision should be entered awarding the compensation described in paragraph 6 of this Stipulation.

6. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with the terms of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $85,000.00, in the form of a check payable to petitioner. This amount

represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C.

§ 300aa-I 5(a) for injuries allegedly related to petitioner’s receipt of the Tdap

vaccine.

7. As soon as practicable after the entry of judgment on entitlement in this case, and after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings before the special master to award reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in proceeding upon this petition.

8. Petitioner and her attorney represent that they have identified to respondent all known sources of payment for items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), including State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. § 1396

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2021).

Cummings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Cummings v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-1
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-1
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(1)
§ 300aa-I
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-I
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a