Cummings v. Schickvam
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WILLIAM CUMMINGS, : CIVIL NO. 1:21-CV-1006 : Plaintiff, : (Judge Mannion) : v. : : (Magistrate Judge Carlson) J. SCHICKVAM, et al., : : Defendants. :
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
The background of this order is as follows: The plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, commenced this action by a complaint on June 7, 2021. (Doc. 1.) Since that time, Cummings filed numerous documents which purport to amend his complaint in a random, fragmentary and incomplete fashion. Cummings also filed yet another motion which sought to further amend his pleadings. (Doc. 33). Construing this motion as, in effect, a motion to further amend this amended complaint on July 30, 2021 we entered an order which noted that the motion to amend is unaccompanied by any proposed amended complaint, as required by Local Rule 15.1 which provides as follows: LR 15.1 Amended Pleadings.
1 (a) Proposed amendment to accompany the motion.
When a party files a motion requesting leave to file an amended pleading, the proposed amended pleading must be retyped or reprinted so that it will be complete in itself including exhibits and shall be filed on paper as a separate document or, in the Electronic Filing System, as an attachment to the motion. If the motion is granted, the clerk shall forthwith file the amended pleading. Unless otherwise ordered, an amended pleading that does not add a new defendant shall be deemed to have been served for the purpose of determining the time for response under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a), on the date the court grants leave for its filing. A party granted leave to amend its pleading, when the amended pleading would add a new defendant, shall file and effect service of the amended pleading within thirty (30) days after the date of the Order granting leave for its filing.
(b) Highlighting of amendments.
The party filing the motion requesting leave to file an amended pleading shall provide: (1) the proposed amended pleading as set forth in subsection (a) of this rule, and (2) a copy of the original pleading in which stricken material has been lined through and any new material has been inserted and underlined or set forth in bold-faced type.
Local Rule 15.1. Since the motion to amend violated Local Rule 15.1,we denied this motion to amend but informed Cummings that he needed to file a single comprehensive amended complaint on or before August 30, 2021. (Doc. 35). As this deadline has approached Cummings has filed documents which continue to make isolated and fragmentary claims, and has alleged that he is unable to file a single comprehensive complaint unless all of his prior filings are copied and returned to
2 him. (Docs. 42-47). Because the proliferation of these filings makes Cummings’ demand unreasonably burdensome, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. The clerk shall provide Cummings with a copy of his original complaint and the docket sheet in this case. 2. On or before September 27, 2021, the plaintiff is directed to prepare a
comprehensive proposed amended complaint, and submit this proposed amended complaint, along with a motion to amend in the form called for by Local Rule 15.1, and a brief in support of this motion. 3. We instruct the plaintiff that this Aamended complaint must be complete
in all respects. It must be a new pleading which stands by itself as an adequate complaint without reference to the complaint already filed.@ Young v. Keohane, 809 F. Supp. 1185, 1198 (M.D. Pa. 1992). See e.g.,
Biggins v. Danberg, No. 10-732, 2012 WL 37132 (D.Del. Jan. 6, 2012); Quirindongo v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, No. 10-1742, 2011 WL 2456624 (M.D. Pa. June 16, 2011). Therefore, in amending this complaint, the plaintiff=s amended complaint must recite factual
allegations which are sufficient to raise the plaintiff=s claimed right to relief beyond the level of mere speculation, contain Aa short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,@ Fed.
3 R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), set forth in averments that are Aconcise, and direct,@ Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(e)(1), and stated in separately numbered paragraphs
describing the date and time of the events alleged, and identifying wherever possible the participants in the acts about which the plaintiff complains.
4. This complaint must be a new pleading which stands by itself as an adequate complaint without reference to any other pleading already filed. Young v. Keohane, 809 F. Supp. 1185, 1198 (M.D. Pa. 1992). The complaint should set forth plaintiff's claims in short, concise and plain
statements, and in sequentially numbered paragraphs. It should name proper defendants, specify the offending actions taken by a particular defendant, be signed, and indicate the nature of the relief sought. Further,
the claims set forth in the complaint should arise out of the same transaction, occurrence, or series of transactions or occurrences, and they should contain a question of law or fact common to all defendants. 5. Failure to comply with these instructions may result in the dismissal of this
lawsuit and this order is entered without prejudice to the assertion of any defenses or dispositive motions that the defendants may believe are appropriate with respect to any amended complaint. Further any amended
4 complaint is subject to a screening review to determine whether it states a claim upon which relief may be granted.
SO ORDERED, this 31st day of August 2021.
/s/ Martin C. Carlson Martin C. Carlson United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. Schickvam (Cummings v. Schickvam) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.