Cummings v. Pruden
11 Mass. 206
Opinion
Let the judgment be reversed as to the damages awarded to the defendant, and affirmed as to the costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. Pruden, 11 Mass. 206 (Mass. 1814).
11 Mass. 206 (Cummings v. Pruden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tomasello, Jr. v. Walton
129 So. 840 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Huffstutler v. Louisville Packing Co.
45 So. 418 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1908)
Samaha v. Samaha
18 App. D.C. 76 (D.C. Circuit, 1901)
Merchants' Bank v. Schulenberg
19 N.W. 741 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1884)
Griel v. Loftin
65 Ala. 591 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1880)
Fink v. Bruihl
47 Mo. 173 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1870)
Lisbon v. Lyman
49 N.H. 553 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1870)
Fowler v. Lawson
15 Ark. 148 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1854)
Edington v. Pickle
33 Tenn. 122 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1853)
Eames v. Stevens
26 N.H. 117 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1852)
Jordan v. Dennis
48 Mass. 590 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1844)
White v. Holman
12 Me. 157 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1835)