Cummings v. Poirier & McLane Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cummings v. Poirier & McLane Corp.

263 A.D. 739, 31 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 24, 1941

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 739 (Cummings v. Poirier & McLane Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummings v. Poirier & McLane Corp., 263 A.D. 739, 31 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover on an alleged oral contract of employment, judgment of the City Court of Yonkers entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, reversed on the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. The verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, both on the issue of the making of an agreement to pay fifty-three cents per hour, and on the issue of plaintiff’s conduct constituting a waiver of his right to demand additional compensation. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover on an alleged oral contract of employment, judgment of the City Court of Yonkers entered on the verdict of a jury in favor of plaintiff, reversed on the facts and a new trial ordered, costs to abide the event. The verdict is against the weight of the credible evidence, both on the issue of the making of an agreement to pay fifty-three cents per hour, and on the issue of plaintiff’s conduct constituting a waiver of his right to demand additional compensation. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 739, 31 N.Y.S.2d 98, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-poirier-mclane-corp-nyappdiv-1941.