Cummings v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.
92 Pa. 82, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 384
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court was entered November 17th 1879,
This case is not distinguishable from Mulherrin v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 31 P. F. Smith 366. The side track here, though upon the property of the plaintiff’s employee, was nevertheless used by the defendant and by his license. The plaintiff below was therefore employed on or about the defendant’s road, and within the very terms of the Act of 1868.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co., 92 Pa. 82, 1879 Pa. LEXIS 384 (Pa. 1879).
92 Pa. 82 (Cummings v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hayman v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
63 A. 967 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1906)
Hobbs v. Pennsylvania R.
143 F. 180 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania, 1906)
Yarrington v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
143 F. 565 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Pennsylvania, 1906)
Weaver v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.
52 A. 30 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Peplinski v. Pennsylvania Railroad
52 A. 32 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)
Kelly v. Union Traction Co.
49 A. 70 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1901)
Spisak v. Balt. & Ohio R. R.
25 A. 497 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)
Christman v. Phila. R.
21 A. 738 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)
Stone v. Pennsylvania R.
19 A. 67 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1890)