Cummings v. People

Illinois Supreme Court

Cummings v. People

50 Ill. 136

DecidedJanuary 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 50 Ill. 136 (Cummings v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummings v. People, 50 Ill. 136 (Ill. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Chief Justice Breese :

This case differs in no essential particular from the preceding case, except this suit was brought against Cummings and his sureties, five in number, on his bond as collector of the revenue of Jersey county. The name of the omitted surety was Mortimer B. Scott.

The same rules and principles which we have applied to the foregoing case,, are applicable to this case, and the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Chief Justice Breese :

This case differs in no essential particular from the preceding case, except this suit was brought against Cummings and his sureties, five in number, on his bond as collector of the revenue of Jersey county. The name of the omitted surety was Mortimer B. Scott.

The same rules and principles which we have applied to the foregoing case,, are applicable to this case, and the judgment must be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 Ill. 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-people-ill-1869.