Cummings v. Parks
2 Ind. 148
This text of 2 Ind. 148 (Cummings v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cummings v. Parks, 2 Ind. 148 (Ind. 1850).
Opinion
CUMMINGS sued Paries for malicious prosecution. Plea, not guilty. There are some special pleas, but they need not be further noticed.
Verdict and judgment for the defendant.
Held, that as the plaintiff gave no evidence of the [149]*149want of probable cause, the verdict must, therefore, be right. Adams v. Lisher, 3 Blackf. 445.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Board of Commissioners v. Washington Township
23 N.E. 257 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1890)
Goodwin v. Smith
72 Ind. 113 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1880)
Trogden v. Deckard
45 Ind. 572 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1874)
Lacy v. Mitchell
23 Ind. 67 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
2 Ind. 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-parks-ind-1850.