Cummings v. National Labor Relations Board

678 F. App'x 101
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 27, 2017·No. No. 16-2208·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annette Cummings sought judicial review of a decision by the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board. Finding that it did not have subject matter jurisdiction to review prosecutorial decisions of the Board’s General Counsel, the district court dismissed the action. Cummings appeals this order and a subsequent order denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cummings v. NLRB, No. 1:16-cv-00216-RDB (D. Md. June 28, 2016; Oct. 20, 2016). We grant Cummings leave to proceed in forma pauperis, but deny her motion for discovery. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. National Labor Relations Board, 678 F. App'x 101 (4th Cir. 2017).

678 F. App'x 101 (Cummings v. National Labor Relations Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Azar
D. Maryland, 2023
Lehan v. Wilson
D. Maryland, 2023