Cummings v. Montalvo

135 So. 3d 389, 2014 WL 470650, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1614
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 3, 2014·No. No. 5D13-4431·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks prohibition following an order denying his motion to disqualify the trial judge. The motion, which sought disqualification based upon the judge’s statements indicating that she had strongly and definitively prejudged Petitioner’s credibility in an unfavorable fashion, should have been granted. See Brown v. St. George Island, Ltd., 561 So.2d 253, 257 (Fla.1990). Because Petitioner has alleged facts that would create in a reasonably prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial, id., we quash the order denying the motion to disqualify and remand to the trial court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We trust that the issuance of a formal writ will be unnecessary.

PETITION GRANTED.

SAWAYA, PALMER and LAWSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. Montalvo, 135 So. 3d 389, 2014 WL 470650, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 1614 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

135 So. 3d 389 (Cummings v. Montalvo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miami-Dade County Expressway Authority v. Electronic Transaction Consultants Corp.
212 So. 3d 1059 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)