Cummings v. International Union Security Police & Fire Professionals, Local 555

Fourth Circuit

Cummings v. International Union Security Police & Fire Professionals, Local 555

678 F. App'x 103

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 27, 2017

DocketNo. 16-2369

StatusPublished

This text of 678 F. App'x 103 (Cummings v. International Union Security Police & Fire Professionals, Local 555) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummings v. International Union Security Police & Fire Professionals, Local 555, 678 F. App'x 103 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annette Cummings appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging breach of employment contract and violations of the National Labor Relations Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cummings v. Int’l Union Sec. Police & Fire Prof'ls of Am., No. 1:16-cv-01868-RDB, 2016 WL 6822473 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2016). We grant Cummings leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, grant Appellees’ motion to extend time to file the informal response brief, and deny Cummings’ motion to strike the informal response brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AEFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Annette Cummings appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint alleging breach of employment contract and violations of the National Labor Relations Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cummings v. Int’l Union Sec. Police & Fire Prof'ls of Am., No. 1:16-cv-01868-RDB, 2016 WL 6822473 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 2016). We grant Cummings leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, grant Appellees’ motion to extend time to file the informal response brief, and deny Cummings’ motion to strike the informal response brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AEFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

678 F. App'x 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-international-union-security-police-fire-professionals-local-ca4-2017.