Cummings v. Daughety

73 Miss. 405
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 73 Miss. 405 (Cummings v. Daughety) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummings v. Daughety, 73 Miss. 405 (Mich. 1895).

Opinion

Cooper, C. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The demurrer was to the whole, but some of the causes assigned related to only a part of the declaration. The court overruled it, except as to the grounds going only to a part of the declaration, as to which it was sustained. A demurrer is an entire thing, and must be overruled or sustained, and if it is not a full defense to the whole declaration or count to which it is applied, it should be overruled. Chitty on Pleadings, 66é.

As a demurrer to the whole declaration it is bad, for on the facts stated the plaintiff was entitled to some recovery.

The judgment is reversed and cause remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boler v. Mosby
352 So. 2d 1320 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1977)
Gully v. Board of Sup'rs
147 So. 300 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1933)
L. J. Alford Lumber Co. v. Ragland
63 So. 338 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1913)
Jacobs v. Postal Telegraph Cable Co.
76 Miss. 278 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Miss. 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-daughety-miss-1895.