Cummings v. Cummings
This text of 8 Watts 366 (Cummings v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The presumption from a mother’s maintenance of her child, whatever be the means of either, is that she furnished [367]*367it as a gift. If the child has nothing to recur to, the presumption is irresistible; and if it even has an estate, her omission to have it applied by a guardian, is equally so. Perhaps one case could not be picked out of a thousand, in which the presumption would not accord with the fact. They who would set bounds to the generosity of a mother, know, but little about the impulses of such a parent. The presumption, therefore, being legitimately founded in the natural course of things, prevails till it is rebutted; and as the plaintiff did not offer a prima facie case, the evidence was rightly excluded.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
8 Watts 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-cummings-pa-1839.