Cummings v. Cummings
158 A. 537, 109 N.J. Eq. 637, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 865
Opinion
The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the conclusions of Vice-Chancellor Backes.
For affirmance — -The Chiee-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Daly, Donges, Van Buskirk, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 15-
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummings v. Cummings, 158 A. 537, 109 N.J. Eq. 637, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 865 (N.J. 1932).
158 A. 537 (Cummings v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sheehan v. Sheehan
92 A.2d 45 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1952)
Smith v. Smith
33 A.2d 684 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1943)