Cummings v. Cummings
685 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 1997 WL 5169
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 8, 1997
DocketNos. 96-2937, 96-3760
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases
This text of 685 So. 2d 101 (Cummings v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cummings v. Cummings, 685 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 1997 WL 5169 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
We reverse the contempt orders. On remand we direct the trial court to determine what portion of the purge amount was necessary for support. Further, we direct that appellant’s present ability to pay also be determined as the record before this court [102]*102reflects that appellant’s pending bankruptcy frustrates same.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cummings v. Cummings
37 So. 3d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Susan Cummings v. Lawrence B. Cummings
244 F.3d 1263 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Cummings v. Cummings
260 F.3d 1263 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
685 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 1997 WL 5169, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-cummings-fladistctapp-1997.