Cummings v. Cummings

685 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 1997 WL 5169
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 8, 1997·No. Nos. 96-2937, 96-3760·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the contempt orders. On remand we direct the trial court to determine what portion of the purge amount was necessary for support. Further, we direct that appellant’s present ability to pay also be determined as the record before this court [102]*102reflects that appellant’s pending bankruptcy frustrates same.

GLICKSTEIN, STONE and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. Cummings, 685 So. 2d 101, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 83, 1997 WL 5169 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

685 So. 2d 101 (Cummings v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cummings v. Cummings
37 So. 3d 287 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Susan Cummings v. Lawrence B. Cummings
244 F.3d 1263 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)
Cummings v. Cummings
260 F.3d 1263 (Eleventh Circuit, 2001)