Cummings v. Commonwealth ex rel. Beardell
This text of 606 A.2d 896 (Cummings v. Commonwealth ex rel. Beardell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 1992, the matter is dismissed for mootness. We note that this matter is unique in that an injury has been asserted but no request for a remedy has been made. Therefore, we have no other recourse but to consider that this case is moot. It is the longstanding policy of this Court not to render an advisory opinion. We must apply this policy in the instant case even though the facts would indicate that there was no apparent impropriety by Michael Cummings, Jr.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
606 A.2d 896, 530 Pa. 21, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-commonwealth-ex-rel-beardell-pa-1992.