Cummings v. Commonwealth ex rel. Beardell

606 A.2d 896, 530 Pa. 21, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 273
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 16, 1992
DocketAppeal No. 36 E.D. Appeal Dkt. 1991
StatusPublished

This text of 606 A.2d 896 (Cummings v. Commonwealth ex rel. Beardell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummings v. Commonwealth ex rel. Beardell, 606 A.2d 896, 530 Pa. 21, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 273 (Pa. 1992).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 16th day of April, 1992, the matter is dismissed for mootness. We note that this matter is unique in that an injury has been asserted but no request for a remedy has been made. Therefore, we have no other recourse but to consider that this case is moot. It is the longstanding policy of this Court not to render an advisory opinion. We must apply this policy in the instant case even though the facts would indicate that there was no apparent impropriety by Michael Cummings, Jr.

LARSEN, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
606 A.2d 896, 530 Pa. 21, 1992 Pa. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-commonwealth-ex-rel-beardell-pa-1992.