Cummings v. Chevrier

10 Cal. 519
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1858
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 10 Cal. 519 (Cummings v. Chevrier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummings v. Chevrier, 10 Cal. 519 (Cal. 1858).

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.

The Court below erred in entering the order appealed from, upon the allegations and proofs before it.

In order to entitle a surviving husband or wife to the whole common property, it must be affirmatively shown that there are no descendants of the deceased. (§ 10 of Law concerning Husband and Wife, Wood’s Digest, 488.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Cummings v. Chevrier, (No. 2.)—Reversed and remanded, for the reason stated in the opinion in Cummings v. Chevrier, (No. 1.)

Terry, C. J.

We concur: Baldwin, J.,

Field, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lowe v. Matson
35 Ill. App. 602 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Sharon v. Shaw
2 Nev. 289 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1866)
Doak v. Brubaker
1 Nev. 218 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Cal. 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummings-v-chevrier-cal-1858.