Cummings v. Chevrier

10 Cal. 519
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court

Baldwin, J., and Field, J., concurring.

The Court below erred in entering the order appealed from, upon the allegations and proofs before it.

In order to entitle a surviving husband or wife to the whole common property, it must be affirmatively shown that there are no descendants of the deceased. (§ 10 of Law concerning Husband and Wife, Wood’s Digest, 488.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Cummings v. Chevrier, (No. 2.)—Reversed and remanded, for the reason stated in the opinion in Cummings v. Chevrier, (No. 1.)

Terry, C. J.

We concur: Baldwin, J.,

Field, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cummings v. Chevrier, 10 Cal. 519 (Cal. 1858).

10 Cal. 519 (Cummings v. Chevrier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lowe v. Matson
35 Ill. App. 602 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1890)
Sharon v. Shaw
2 Nev. 289 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1866)
Doak v. Brubaker
1 Nev. 218 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1865)