Cummer v. Moon
15 P.2d 1098, 91 Mont. 605, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 69
Opinion
This cause came on regularly for hearing, respondent appearing pro se, counsel for appellant not appearing. Thereupon counsel for respondent moved to dismiss the appeal. It appearing that appellant’s brief does not comply with subdivisions (b) and (c) of section 3, Rule X of this court, and that the undertaking on appeal does not comply with the provisions of section 9734, Revised Codes of 1921, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cummer v. Moon, 15 P.2d 1098, 91 Mont. 605, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 69 (Mo. 1932).
15 P.2d 1098 (Cummer v. Moon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.