Cummer v. Moon

Montana Supreme Court

Cummer v. Moon

15 P.2d 1098, 91 Mont. 605, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 69

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 13, 1932

DocketNo. 6,902.

StatusPublished

This text of 15 P.2d 1098 (Cummer v. Moon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cummer v. Moon, 15 P.2d 1098, 91 Mont. 605, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 69 (Mo. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on regularly for hearing, respondent appearing pro se, counsel for appellant not appearing. Thereupon counsel for respondent moved to dismiss the appeal. It appearing that appellant’s brief does not comply with subdivisions (b) and (c) of section 3, Rule X of this court, and that the undertaking on appeal does not comply with the provisions of section 9734, Revised Codes of 1921, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on regularly for hearing, respondent appearing pro se, counsel for appellant not appearing. Thereupon counsel for respondent moved to dismiss the appeal. It appearing that appellant’s brief does not comply with subdivisions (b) and (c) of section 3, Rule X of this court, and that the undertaking on appeal does not comply with the provisions of section 9734, Revised Codes of 1921, it is ordered that the appeal be, and it is hereby, dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 P.2d 1098, 91 Mont. 605, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummer-v-moon-mont-1932.