Cummer Mfg. Co. v. Lilly

204 S.W. 1010, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 720
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 17, 1918
DocketNo. 6013.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 204 S.W. 1010 (Cummer Mfg. Co. v. Lilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cummer Mfg. Co. v. Lilly, 204 S.W. 1010, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 720 (Tex. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

FLY, C. J.

This is a suit instituted by appellee to recover damages of appellant for failure to deliver 19,000 onion crates contracted by it to be delivered in Frio county. Appellant pleaded its privilege to be sued in Lamar county, Tex. The plea was overruled, and this appeal is from that order. .

This case is siinilár to that of Cummer Manufacturing Company v. Kellam Bros., 203 S. W. 463, this day decided by this court, and every point in this case is decided in that case. It is not contended in this case, however, as in that, that changes were made in the contract between appellee and the agents by appellant. In the testimony it was admitted by appellant that it ratified the contract made between appellee and the agents without change. The authority of the agents to make the contract in Frio county was admitted. The cause of action arose in Frio county. The venue was in Frio county. Rev. St. art. 1830, subsec. 24. The evidence as to loss by appellee would not have prejudiced the cause of appellant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pittman & Harrison Co. v. Boatenhamer
210 S.W. 972 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
204 S.W. 1010, 1918 Tex. App. LEXIS 720, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cummer-mfg-co-v-lilly-texapp-1918.