Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Blum
This text of 304 N.W.2d 328 (Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant Lois E. Blum seeks to appeal from an order of the district court granting the motion of plaintiff Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. to have its requests for admission deemed admitted in this subrogation action to recover amounts paid on a fiduciary bond. Minn.R.Civ.App. P. 103.03 makes no provision for appeal of pretrial discovery orders, and we have stated that the appropriate means to obtain review of such orders is by a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus. Parker v. Hennepin County District Court, Fourth Judicial District, 285 N.W.2d 81 (Minn.1979); Mampel v. Eastern Heights State Bank of St. Paul, 254 N.W.2d 375 (Minn.1977). Nonetheless, the Parker case raised the identical issue here presented and is, therefore, controlling. We see no benefit in dismissing the appeal rather than applying Parker despite the procedural irregularity.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 N.W.2d 328, 1981 Minn. LEXIS 1227, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumis-insurance-society-inc-v-blum-minn-1981.