Cuminale v. Great Oaks Casualty Insurance Co.
562 So. 2d 739, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3119, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1277
Opinions
Affirmed. Porr v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 452 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984), review dismissed, 496 So.2d 816 (Fla.1986); Griffin v. Travelers Indem. Co., 328 So.2d 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976).
NESBITT and GODERICH, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cuminale v. Great Oaks Casualty Insurance Co., 562 So. 2d 739, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 3119, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 1277 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
562 So. 2d 739 (Cuminale v. Great Oaks Casualty Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Porr v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
452 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Schultz v. First Edina National Bank
409 N.W.2d 281 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1987)
Mathews v. Ranger Insurance Company
281 So. 2d 345 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1973)
Nat. Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United Serv. Auto. Ass'n
400 So. 2d 526 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Griffin v. Travelers Indemnity Company
328 So. 2d 207 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1976)
Benton v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.
295 So. 2d 344 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)