Cumento v. Umali

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cumento v. Umali

212 A.D.2d 660, 623 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1724

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 21, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 660 (Cumento v. Umali) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cumento v. Umali, 212 A.D.2d 660, 623 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendants, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated September 3, 1993, as granted the plaintiff’s motion to vacate a stipulation, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 3, [661]*6611993, as granted the motion by Ruperto Ona, Juan Mateo, and Esther Ramos to intervene in this action.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Di Tucci at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendants, as limited by their brief, from so much of (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Di Tucci, J.), dated September 3, 1993, as granted the plaintiff’s motion to vacate a stipulation, and (2) an order of the same court, dated September 3, [661]*6611993, as granted the motion by Ruperto Ona, Juan Mateo, and Esther Ramos to intervene in this action.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs, for reasons stated by Justice Di Tucci at the Supreme Court. Sullivan, J. P., Miller, Copertino, Joy and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

212 A.D.2d 660, 623 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumento-v-umali-nyappdiv-1995.