Cumby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cumby v. State

146 S.E. 327, 39 Ga. App. 125, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 216

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 15, 1929

Docket19330

StatusPublished

This text of 146 S.E. 327 (Cumby v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cumby v. State, 146 S.E. 327, 39 Ga. App. 125, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 216 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

In misdemeanors all who participate in the criminal act, either as principals or accessories, are guilty as principals; and in misdemeanors the accused can be convicted on the unsupported evidence of an accomplice. Under these rulings and the facts of the instant case the verdict was authorized, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and there being no complaint of an error of law, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboyles, C. J.

In misdemeanors all who participate in the criminal act, either as principals or accessories, are guilty as principals; and in misdemeanors the accused can be convicted on the unsupported evidence of an accomplice. Under these rulings and the facts of the instant case the verdict was authorized, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and there being no complaint of an error of law, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 S.E. 327, 39 Ga. App. 125, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumby-v-state-gactapp-1929.