Cumby v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cumby v. State

146 S.E. 327, 39 Ga. App. 125, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 216

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cumby v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 43 Ga. App. 328 →

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1929·No. 19330·Published

Opinion

Bboyles, C. J.

In misdemeanors all who participate in the criminal act, either as principals or accessories, are guilty as principals; and in misdemeanors the accused can be convicted on the unsupported evidence of an accomplice. Under these rulings and the facts of the instant case the verdict was authorized, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and there being no complaint of an error of law, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bboyles, C. J.

In misdemeanors all who participate in the criminal act, either as principals or accessories, are guilty as principals; and in misdemeanors the accused can be convicted on the unsupported evidence of an accomplice. Under these rulings and the facts of the instant case the verdict was authorized, and, the finding of the jury having been approved by the trial judge, and there being no complaint of an error of law, this court is without authority to interfere.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Cumby v. State, 146 S.E. 327, 39 Ga. App. 125, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 216 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

146 S.E. 327 (Cumby v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.