Cumbie v. Cumbie

395 So. 2d 1195, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20236
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1981·No. No. WW-471·Published

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We construe the final judgment in this dissolution of marriage action as granting the wife prospective credit, at the time of partition, for ownership expenses she had paid and will pay on the marital home from the date the final judgment was filed. This is proper. Smith v. Smith, 390 So.2d 1223 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). The wife has not made an adequate showing that the trial judge abused his discretion in denying her request that she be awarded the home as a [1196] special equity. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980).

Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., J., and WILLIAM C. OWEN, Jr., (Retired) Associate Judge, concur. MILLS, C. J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cumbie v. Cumbie, 395 So. 2d 1195, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20236 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

395 So. 2d 1195 (Cumbie v. Cumbie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Smith v. Smith
390 So. 2d 1223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)