Cumbey v. Urschel

1935 OK 234, 42 P.2d 902, 171 Okla. 389, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 218
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 12, 1935
DocketNos. 23754, 24281.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1935 OK 234 (Cumbey v. Urschel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cumbey v. Urschel, 1935 OK 234, 42 P.2d 902, 171 Okla. 389, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 218 (Okla. 1935).

Opinion

RILEY, J.

' In the latter cause a demurrer to the evidence of plaintiff was sustained and judgment rendered for defendant. In the former cause defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was sustained.

The decisive question involved in these appeals is whether, under the laws of the state of Oklahoma, a railroad corporation has capacity to acquire by purchase fee title to lands necessary for railroad purposes.

In both causes the instruments in question are general warranty deeds, and by unambiguous words these deeds purport to convey estates in 'fee. There are no reservations in the deeds; neither deed purports to limit the grant of land “for railroad purnoses.”

The effect of the judgments below was to answer the decisive question in the affirmative and in accord with the decision of this court in Marland v. Gillespie, 168 Okla. 376, 33 P. (2d) 207.

Judgments affirmed.

McNEILL, C. j., and BUSBY, PHELPS, and GIBSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corbyn v. Oklahoma City
1946 OK 77 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1935 OK 234, 42 P.2d 902, 171 Okla. 389, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumbey-v-urschel-okla-1935.