Cumberledge v. Cole

44 Iowa 181
Supreme Court of Iowa·Decided October 5, 1876·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Adams, J.

Proof of possession is presumptive proof of ownership. Greenleaf on Ev., 1st Mol., Sec. 34. The plaintiff made a prima faeie case by proof of possession. The presumption was not overcome by proof that the defendant afterwards acquired possession, because it appeared that he broke the plaintiff’s inclosure and took the calf from the plaintiff’s possession. He could acquire no legal advantage thereby.

Nor was the presumption in favor of the plaintiff overcome by the evidence as to ownership prior to the taking of posses-' sion by the plaintiff, because the court finds that the evidence on that point is balanced. We are of the opinion, therefore, that the decision of the Circuit Court was correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cumberledge v. Cole, 44 Iowa 181 (iowa 1876).

44 Iowa 181 (Cumberledge v. Cole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marhoefer v. Merchants National Bank
10 N.W.2d 85 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1943)
Wilson v. Findley
275 N.W. 47 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1937)
Stewart v. Wild
208 N.W. 303 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
Adamson v. Harper
143 N.W. 844 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1913)