Cumberledge v. Cole

44 Iowa 181
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedOctober 5, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 44 Iowa 181 (Cumberledge v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cumberledge v. Cole, 44 Iowa 181 (iowa 1876).

Opinion

Adams, J.

Proof of possession is presumptive proof of ownership. Greenleaf on Ev., 1st Mol., Sec. 34. The plaintiff made a prima faeie case by proof of possession. The presumption was not overcome by proof that the defendant afterwards acquired possession, because it appeared that he broke the plaintiff’s inclosure and took the calf from the plaintiff’s possession. He could acquire no legal advantage thereby.

Nor was the presumption in favor of the plaintiff overcome by the evidence as to ownership prior to the taking of posses-' sion by the plaintiff, because the court finds that the evidence on that point is balanced. We are of the opinion, therefore, that the decision of the Circuit Court was correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marhoefer v. Merchants National Bank
10 N.W.2d 85 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1943)
Wilson v. Findley
275 N.W. 47 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1937)
Stewart v. Wild
208 N.W. 303 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1926)
Adamson v. Harper
143 N.W. 844 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 Iowa 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumberledge-v-cole-iowa-1876.