Cumberlander v. King George County Circuit Court
This text of 598 F. App'x 201 (Cumberlander v. King George County Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Maurice L. Cumberlander appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cumberlander v. King George Cnty. Circuit Court, No. 1:14-cv-01278-CMH-JFA (E.D.Va. Nov. 12, 2014). We deny Cumberlander’s motion for injunctive relief pending appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
598 F. App'x 201, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumberlander-v-king-george-county-circuit-court-ca4-2015.