Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtiss
145 S.W. 377, 147 Ky. 685, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 318
This text of 145 S.W. 377 (Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtiss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtiss, 145 S.W. 377, 147 Ky. 685, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 318 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).
Opinion
[686]*686Opinion op the Court by
On Motion for Damages.
Where a judgment is superseded and the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, 10 per cent, damages under the statute may be awarded. (American Accident Co. v. Slaughter, 101 Ky., 269; Nelson County v. Bardstown, 123 Ky., 836.
Motion sustained.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Payne v. Smith
249 S.W. 995 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
145 S.W. 377, 147 Ky. 685, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumberland-telephone-telegraph-co-v-curtiss-kyctapp-1912.