Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtis

142 S.W. 385, 146 Ky. 286, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 46
CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky
DecidedJanuary 18, 1912
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 142 S.W. 385 (Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cumberland Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Curtis, 142 S.W. 385, 146 Ky. 286, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 46 (Ky. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Nunn

Dismissing.

At the October term, 1910, of the Ohio Circuit Court,' appellees recovered a verdict against appellant, for $500, and appellant made a motion for a new trial during the pendency of which, appellees moved to remit $350 of the verdict, which the court did, thus reducing the amount of the verdict to $150 for which judgment was' rendered, and this appeal is prosecuted. Section 950, of the Kentucky Statutes', in so far as applicable to the question involved, is as follows:

“No appeal shall be taken to the Court of Appeals from a judgment for the recovery of money or personal property, if the value in controversy be less than two hundred dollars, exclusive of interest and cost,” etc.

[287]*287Therefore,- this court is without jurisdiction, as the amount in controversy in this case is less than two hundred dollars. It appears that the judgment for $500 was reduced by the lower court to the amount of $150 and this is the amount in controversy upon this appeal. This court has no power to act without jurisdiction, and any act by this court on this appeal would be void, therefore, the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. Bradley
174 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
142 S.W. 385, 146 Ky. 286, 1912 Ky. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumberland-telephone-telegraph-co-v-curtis-kyctapp-1912.