Cumberland Lumber Co. v. Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co.

81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 294, 8 Buchanan 294, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 293
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 6, 1911·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Emery.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Congdon — -13. For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cumberland Lumber Co. v. Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co., 81 A. 1133, 78 N.J. Eq. 294, 8 Buchanan 294, 1911 N.J. LEXIS 293 (N.J. 1911).

81 A. 1133 (Cumberland Lumber Co. v. Clinton Hill Lumber & Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.