Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Mengloi
Opinion
We affirm, without prejudice, the trial court’s denial of appellants’, D.B. “Jim” Haseotes’, George Haseotes’, Byron Ha-seotes’ and James M. Mumma’s, motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction on the authority of Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Scott, 545 So.2d 508 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989). We do not, however, review that part of the trial court’s order which denied appellants’ motions to dismiss based upon mis-joinder and multifariousness because this is a non-final order for which no appeal is provided under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130 nor is it reviewable by certiorari under Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(A).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
587 So. 2d 1188 (Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Mengloi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.