Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Mengloi
This text of 587 So. 2d 1188 (Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Mengloi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm, without prejudice, the trial court’s denial of appellants’, D.B. “Jim” Haseotes’, George Haseotes’, Byron Ha-seotes’ and James M. Mumma’s, motions to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction on the authority of Gaines Motor Lines, Inc. v. Scott, 545 So.2d 508 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1989). We do not, however, review that part of the trial court’s order which denied appellants’ motions to dismiss based upon mis-joinder and multifariousness because this is a non-final order for which no appeal is provided under Fla.R.App.P. 9.130 nor is it reviewable by certiorari under Fla.R.App.P. 9.030(b)(2)(A).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 So. 2d 1188, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 10979, 1991 WL 225583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumberland-farms-inc-v-mengloi-fladistctapp-1991.