Cumberland Building & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.

98 A. 652, 253 Pa. 450, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 869
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 17, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 60·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The judgment in this case was entered by the court below in pursuance of some agreement on the part of counsel for the appellant that it should be entered. He and counsel for appellee, when the case was called for argument, differed as to the conditions annexed to the said agreement. Under the circumstances it is ordered that the judgment be vacated, that the rule to show cause why it should not be entered be reinstated and that the record be remitted for the due disposition of the said rule.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cumberland Building & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co., 98 A. 652, 253 Pa. 450, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 869 (Pa. 1916).

98 A. 652 (Cumberland Building & Loan Ass'n v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Douglas v. Douglas
371 A.2d 979 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)