Cumberbatch v. Lomenzo

52 A.D.2d 636, 383 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12287

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondent’s determination, dated August 15, 1973 and made after a hearing, which, inter alia, found petitioner guilty of untrustworthiness. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed on the merits, with costs. The determination of the Secretary of State was supported by substantial evidence. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham and Hawkins, JJ., concur; Martuscello and Shapiro, JJ., dissent and vote to annul the determination and grant the application, with the following memorandum: In our opinion the determination of untrustworthiness was not supported by substantial evidence.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cumberbatch v. Lomenzo, 52 A.D.2d 636, 383 N.Y.S.2d 546, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12287 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

52 A.D.2d 636 (Cumberbatch v. Lomenzo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.