Cumbee v. Commissioner
This text of 1978 T.C. Memo. 263 (Cumbee v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION
FAY,
FINDINGS OF FACT
Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly.
Petitioners, Jack A. Cumbee, Jr., and Judith C. Cumbee, husband and wife, resided in Lake Orion, Mich., at the time of filing their petition herein. Based on their religious tenets, the couple claimed a $ 1,128 tax credit on their 1974 joint income tax return. Respondent, in his statutory notice of deficiency, disallowed the credit in its entirety.
OPINION
While petitioners' argument in support of their claimed tax credit has several facets, essentially it is as follows: The use of petitioners' tax dollars for military defense equipment and overseas operations constitutes an impermissible burden on the free exercise of their*252 religious beliefs. Therefore, when the rights protected by the freedom of religion clause of the
While we recognize that petitioners are sincere and dedicated to their beliefs, it is well established that religious or moral objections grounded on the
*253
Footnotes
1. Moreover, petitioners' apparent willingness to pay an alternative tax has no bearing on their Federal income tax liability.
;Egnal v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 255, 263 (1975) .Russell v. Commissioner, 60 T.C. 942, 947↩ (1973)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1978 T.C. Memo. 263, 37 T.C.M. 1139, 1978 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cumbee-v-commissioner-tax-1978.