Culverhouse v. Watkins Co.
124 S.E. 53, 32 Ga. App. 494, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 492
Opinion
The contract sued upon in the instant case was one of suretyship, and not one of guaranty (Watkins Medical Co. v. Marbach, 20 Ga. App. 691, 93 S. E. 270), and the court did not err in any of its rulings upon the demurrers and other pleadings, or upon the admissibility of evidence, or in directing a verdict in favor of the plaintiff and against all the defendants for the full amount sued for.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Culverhouse v. Watkins Co., 124 S.E. 53, 32 Ga. App. 494, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 492 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).
124 S.E. 53 (Culverhouse v. Watkins Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Watkins Medical Co. v. Marbach
93 S.E. 270 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1917)