Culver v. Summit BHC Sacramento, LLC dba Valley Recovery Center of NV

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided May 29, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00140·Unknown

Opinion

WILLIAM J. GEDDES 1 Nevada Bar No. 6984 KRISTEN R. GEDDES 2 Nevada Bar No. 9027 THE GEDDES LAW FIRM, P.C. 3 1575 Delucchi Lane, Suite 206 Reno, Nevada 89502 Phone: (775) 853-9455 Fax: (775) 299-5337 5 Email: Will@TheGeddesLawFirm.com Email: Kristen@TheGeddesLawFirm.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Joe Culver 9 JOE CULVER, an individual, CASE NO: 3:20-cv-140-MMD-WGC 10 Plaintiff, vs. suMMIT BHC SACRAMENTO, LLC d/b/a 13 VALLEY RECOVERY CENTER OF NV, a STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER foreign limited liability company; DOE Regarding 14 BUSINESS ENTITIES 1-10. CONFIDENTIALITY OF DOCUMENTS 15 Defendant. PRODUCED IN LITIGATION

17 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 26(f) and U.S. District Court 18] Nevada Rule (“Local Rule”) 26-1(e), the parties through their respective counsel, hereby submit t 19 following Stipulated Protective Order. RECITALS 21 WHEREAS: the parties to the above-captioned litigation anticipate that discovery will requ: the parties to disclose records and information that are confidential and sensitive, including becau such records are anticipated to include the parties’ private employment records, private medical recor or records containing trade secret information; and 25 WHEREAS: the parties seek to protect and prevent the improper dissemination of su confidential and private records and information to third parties, during the course of litigation and aft the litigation has ended; STIPLUATION

1 THEREFORE: the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipula 2 and request the Court issue an Order (“‘Stipulated Protective Order’), protecting the confidential natu 3 of certain records and information as may be produced during the course of the above-caption matters, as follows: 5 1. If any person or entity, whether or not a party to the instant action, produces or receiv 6 answers to interrogatories, or documents or other things, which the producing or receiving person entity considers to be “Confidential Information,” as defined in § II(3)(A)(1) infra; or 8 2. If there is deposition testimony which any person or entity, whether or not a party to t 9] instant action, believes contains “Confidential Information,” as defined in § II(3)(A)() infra; or 10 3. Third parties produce information which the third-parties assert is confidential, t 11 following procedure shall govern pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Fed. R. Civ. P.”) 26 ( 12] et. seq.: 13 A. Any documents (and the contents thereof), things or information falling with 14]| the definition of “Confidential Information,” set forth in § II(3)(A)(D infra, that are produced may | 3 15|| designated and marked, in whole or in part, without regard to whether redactions are mac 16 “Confidential” by the party producing the documents or information, at the time the documents a 17] delivered to or made available for inspection by any party; 18 I. “Confidential Information” is defined herein as: (a) employment recor of any employees or former employees of any party; (b) confidential notes, memoranda, and statemer 20 regarding non-party employees; (c) confidential information concerning the discipline and/ termination of non-party employees and former employees; (d) the production of information documents proprietary to any party, including by way of example and not limitation, tax □□□□□ 23 financial statements; (e) other private information of any party or non-party to the present litigatic including consumer records, e.g., phone bills; (f) financial records and business records of any pers 25] or entity, whether a party or non-party to the present litigation; and (g) medical records, includi 26] medical bills and psychological records, and medical information of any person, whether a party non-party to the present litigation. 28 B. If a party produces to another party items that contain Confidential Informati

as defined above, that party may designate one or more documents, or a portion of a document, 2 || “Confidential” before producing that document to the other party. Such designation shall be made | 3] marking, stamping or typing the word “Confidential” on each page of the document at the time it produced to the receiving party’s counsel; 5 C. Any party may designate deposition testimony as “Confidential” by oral 6 making such a designation on the record either at the commencement of the deposition, at the time t testimony is given, and/or before the end of that day's questioning. Following such a designation, t court reporter shall mark “Confidential” on the transcript or the portion thereof containing t 9 “Confidential” testimony; 10 D. In addition, documents or items produced by one party may be designat 11 “Confidential” by the other party, i.e., the receiving party, by: 12 I. marking the document, in whole or in part, “Confidential” in the san 13 imanner as stated above; and 14 Il. then forwarding a copy of the marked document back to the produci 3 15 |party; 16 E. In this regard, the receiving party seeking the “Confidential” designation □□ 17] designate, by number, each document it believes should be “Confidential”; 18 F. If the receiving party has no objection to the “Confidential” designation made | the producing party, the receiving party may either expressly notify the producing party or allow the t calendar-day objection period (set forth below) to lapse. Where there has been no written objecti made, once a document or item has been produced and designated as provided herein to the receivi 22 party, the document or item shall be treated as “Confidential,” respectively, pursuant to this Stipulat 23 Protective Order, until further order of the Court; 24 4. The following protocol shall apply in the event of an objection to a designation 25 “Confidential”: 26 A. If there is an objection to the “Confidential” designation, the party so objecti must notify the other party in writing of both the objection and the grounds for the objection within t 28 calendar days from the date the designation was made or the document(s)/item(s) received, whichev

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Culver v. Summit BHC Sacramento, LLC dba Valley Recovery Center of NV, (D. Nev. 2020).

Culver v. Summit BHC Sacramento, LLC dba Valley Recovery Center of NV (Culver v. Summit BHC Sacramento, LLC dba Valley Recovery Center of NV) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)