Culver v. LaRoach
133 S.E.2d 167, 260 N.C. 579, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 751
Opinion
A oa~efu1 review of the evidenice addueed .ini the trial ihelow leadis us to the conclusion that the evidence is insqifficient to establish actionable negligence on the part of the defendant.
Ph~ judgme~at eairte~red below is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Culver v. LaRoach, 133 S.E.2d 167, 260 N.C. 579, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 751 (N.C. 1963).
133 S.E.2d 167 (Culver v. LaRoach) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Saunders v. Warren
141 S.E.2d 308 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1965)
Robertson v. Ghee
138 S.E.2d 220 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1964)