Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Culver v. Berkenfeld

Culver v. Berkenfeld

487 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 993, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7544
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 30, 1986
DocketNo. 85-61
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 487 So. 2d 416 (Culver v. Berkenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Culver v. Berkenfeld, 487 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 993, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7544 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the final judgment in favor of the plaintiff but reverse the order awarding attorney’s fees to the plaintiff and remand with direction to the trial court to make specific findings in accordance with Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), and determine the amount of the attorney’s fees accordingly. We recognize that the trial court did not have the benefit of Rowe at the time of its order, nor did counsel for the parties.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. Pasteur Health Plan HMO, Inc.
550 So. 2d 1174 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Skidmore, Owings & Merrill v. VOLPE CONST., CO.
511 So. 2d 642 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Crosby v. State
487 So. 2d 416 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
487 So. 2d 416, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 993, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 7544, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culver-v-berkenfeld-fladistctapp-1986.