Culton v. Culton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Culton v. Culton

2 A.D.3d 1446, 769 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14358

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 2 A.D.3d 1446 (Culton v. Culton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Culton v. Culton, 2 A.D.3d 1446, 769 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14358 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal from an order of Family Court, Erie County (Dillon, J), entered March 21, 2002, which denied petitioner’s objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner modifying petitioner’s support obligations.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner contends that Family Court erred in denying his objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner modifying his support obligations. The Hearing Examiner’s order is based upon a written stipulation executed by the parties, however, “and no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent” (Matter of Desmond S., 285 AD2d 994, 994 [2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 693 [2002]; see Matter of Misti Z., 300 AD2d 1147 [2002]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J, Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal from an order of Family Court, Erie County (Dillon, J), entered March 21, 2002, which denied petitioner’s objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner modifying petitioner’s support obligations.

It is hereby ordered that said appeal be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed without costs.

Memorandum: Petitioner contends that Family Court erred in denying his objections to the order of the Hearing Examiner modifying his support obligations. The Hearing Examiner’s order is based upon a written stipulation executed by the parties, however, “and no appeal lies from an order entered upon consent” (Matter of Desmond S., 285 AD2d 994, 994 [2001], lv dismissed 97 NY2d 693 [2002]; see Matter of Misti Z., 300 AD2d 1147 [2002]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J, Green, Scudder, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.3d 1446, 769 N.Y.S.2d 431, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14358, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culton-v-culton-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack