Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Culpepper v. Hall

Culpepper v. Hall

97 S.E. 111, 22 Ga. App. 715, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 712
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 16, 1918
Docket9902
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 97 S.E. 111 (Culpepper v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Culpepper v. Hall, 97 S.E. 111, 22 Ga. App. 715, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 712 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Grounds of objection urged as to the admissibility of evidence' during the trial of a case should be set forth in the motion for a new. trial, where the motion complains of the overruling of the objections; and it is not a sufficient assignment of error merely to aver that certain testimony was admitted “over the objection” of the complaining party, without stating what particular objection was urged at the tima

2. Upon the issue of fact raised in this case the evidence authorized, the verdict, and for none of the reasons. assigned did the court err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed,

Wade, G. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maxwell v. Hollis
121 S.E.2d 409 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1961)
Taylor v. Murray
115 S.E.2d 776 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Nissen v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
82 S.E.2d 253 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
City Council of Augusta v. King
187 S.E. 268 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 S.E. 111, 22 Ga. App. 715, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culpepper-v-hall-gactapp-1918.