Culp v. Fiester

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Culp v. Fiester

240 A.D. 929

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 240 A.D. 929 (Culp v. Fiester) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Culp v. Fiester, 240 A.D. 929 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs to the appellants, and judgment granted in favor of the appellants dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, with costs to the appellants. The 20th, 21st, 23d, 24th, 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th, 31st, 32d, 33d, 34th, 35th and 36th findings of fact, and all findings of fact contained in the conclusions of law to the effect that said Viola J. Purcell by fraud, misrepresentation or mistake induced plaintiffs to execute the quitclaim deed in question, are reversed. The court hereby makes a new finding of fact that Viola J. Purcell was guilty of no fraud or misrepresentation inducing the signing of said deed in question by the plaintiffs and that they were not induced to execute the same by any misrepresentation, fraud or mistake, and said deed is valid. Opinion [930]*930by Rhodes, J. (which is not to be published because not of general interest). Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and facts, with costs to the appellants, and judgment granted in favor of the appellants dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint, with costs to the appellants. The 20th, 21st, 23d, 24th, 27th, 28th, 29th, 30th, 31st, 32d, 33d, 34th, 35th and 36th findings of fact, and all findings of fact contained in the conclusions of law to the effect that said Viola J. Purcell by fraud, misrepresentation or mistake induced plaintiffs to execute the quitclaim deed in question, are reversed. The court hereby makes a new finding of fact that Viola J. Purcell was guilty of no fraud or misrepresentation inducing the signing of said deed in question by the plaintiffs and that they were not induced to execute the same by any misrepresentation, fraud or mistake, and said deed is valid. Opinion [930]*930by Rhodes, J. (which is not to be published because not of general interest). Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D. 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culp-v-fiester-nyappdiv-1933.