Culp v. Atlantic City Railroad

110 A. 115, 93 N.J.L. 244, 8 Gummere 244, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 148
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided May 15, 1919·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Garrison in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Swayze,. Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, HepPENHEIMER, WILLIAMS, GARDNER, JJ. 11.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Kalisci-i, JJ. 2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Culp v. Atlantic City Railroad, 110 A. 115, 93 N.J.L. 244, 8 Gummere 244, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 148 (N.J. 1919).

110 A. 115 (Culp v. Atlantic City Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeLong v. Maine Central Railroad
6 A.2d 431 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1939)