Cullum v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided December 28, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-09700·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

SANDRA L. CULLUM; DEIRDRE SALEH, Plaintiffs, v. WYNDHAM HOTELS & RESORTS CORP.; 22-CV-9700 (RA) WYNDHAM DESTINATIONS INC; GEOFFREY A. BALLOTTI; WYNDHAM HOTELS (WH) & ORDER RESORTS, INC.; ELISABETH GALE dba WYNDHAM CORPORATE OFFICE & HEADQUARTERS; BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, Defendants.

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: On December 20, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to amend the complaint, and excused Defendants from their obligation to respond until after an amended complaint is filed. On December 23, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a letter seeking leave to move for default judgment against several of the Defendants in this action. Plaintiffs assert that they served Defendants by certified mail between November 25, 2022 and November 29, 2022, and that Defendants have not appeared or responded to the complaint. In light of the Court’s December 20, 2022 order to amend the complaint, Plaintiffs’ request is denied. As directed in that order, Plaintiffs must amend the Complaint within 60 days of the date of the order, and Defendants are not required to respond to the original complaint. The Court also notes that service of process by certified mail is not permitted under the federal rules, and that Plaintiffs must serve Defendants consistent with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4. See, e.g., Cassano v. Altshuler, 186 F. Supp. 3d 318, 321 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (noting that service on individuals by certified mail “is not permitted under the federal or applicable state rules”); Conway v. Am. Red Cross, No. CV 10-1859 SJF ARL, 2010 WL 4722279, at *4 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 15, 2010) (“Service on a corporation solely by certified mail, return receipt requested is insufficient.”). Plaintiffs are further advised that they may wish to consult the New York Legal Assistance Group's legal clinic for pro se litigants by visiting its website at nylag.org/pro-se-clinic or by calling (212) 659-6190. This clinic, which is neither part of nor run by the Court, assists pro se litigants with federal civil cases. SO ORDERED. Dated: | December 28, 2022 i] . New York, New York KA Sy Ronnie Abrams United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cullum v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Corp., (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Cullum v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Corp. (Cullum v. Wyndham Hotels & Resorts Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cassano v. Altshuler
186 F. Supp. 3d 318 (S.D. New York, 2016)